Housing Solutions for the Richmond Region

Image

The Regional Housing Framework is an initiative of the Partnership for Housing Affordability (PHA) that serves as a blueprint to advance housing policy in the Richmond region, including Chesterfield, Richmond, Henrico, Hanover, and the town of Ashland.

Below we outline the goals of the Framework and the specific solutions contributing to the success of each goal. For each goal, several solutions are identified as “priority”, as indicated by an asterisk (*). These are the solutions that the region should pursue with vigor. Review the criteria for determining priority status.

Regional Housing Goals &
Proposed Solutions

Image

Goal 1: Increase the Supply of Affordable Rental Housing in the Region.

A healthy housing market depends on an adequate and balanced supply of housing options. The region lacks a sufficient supply of affordable rental homes to meet the growing demand. The result is a large deficit that imposes high housing cost burdens on many households.

Major Findings:

  • Since 2009, the percent increase in average rents across the region is double the percent increase in average incomes.
  • In addition to a current deficit of 20,000 affordable rental homes, our region will need to provide over a thousand new homes affordable to low-income households per year between now and 2040, based on household growth projections.
  • Apart from a few hundred affordable apartments brought online on average annually, nearly all new multifamily apartments in the region are priced out of reach to low-income households.
Image

Goal 2: Support Racially Inclusive Wealth Creation by Increasing Homeownership Opportunities for Low and Moderate Income Households.

Homeownership is the most important building block to create wealth among lower income families. More “starter homes” and other low-cost options are required to address this challenge. We must reduce the growing ownership gap between White and minority households.

Major Findings:

  • The Black homeownership rate in Virginia is lower today than it was 50 years ago, reflecting the major institutional and structural factors maintaining the racial homeownership and wealth gaps.
  • There is an extremely tight homebuying market for smaller, modestly priced starter homes that keeps many from obtaining homeownership.
  • As millennials “grow up” and baby boomers seek to downsize, there will be an increased demand for smaller homes available for purchase in denser, amenity-rich neighborhoods.
Image

Goal 3: Ensure that our Growing Senior Population is Safely and Affordably Housed.

Seniors are the most rapidly growing segment of the region’s population, including the fastest growing component of our homeless population. By 2030, one in four residents of our region will be over the age of 65. Many of these seniors wish to “age-in-place,” but a variety of strategies will be needed to address these needs in the next two decades.

Major Findings:

  • The number of mortgage-burdened seniors has more than doubled since 2000—from 7,800 to 16,200. More than one in four senior homeowners are financially burdened by their mortgage.
  • Over 70% of all senior homeowners live in a house valued below $200,000, functionally preventing them from moving into new, age-restricted homes that cost more.
  • By 2040, the region will need to help 37,000 new senior households age-in-place or find new homes.
Image

Goal 4: Improve Housing Quality and Ensure Better Health and Safety for Residents.

Thousands of households in the region occupy housing that is unsafe and in disrepair. These conditions typically affect the poorest and most disadvantaged, but the affected stock is also often the most affordable. Rehabilitation and replacement efforts are necessary to ensure a quality home for every household in the region.

Major Findings:

  • Thousands of dedicated affordable apartments across the region are over 50 years old and require significant investments to stay safe and up to date, including public housing.
  • Many low-income residents in older, unsubsidized “naturally occurring” affordable housing throughout the inner-ring suburbs are at risk of displacement as property values and rents rise. These include over 2,000 mobile homes in manufactured home communities.
Image

Goal 5: Expand Housing Stability and Stop Displacement.

The region is growing and housing prices are rising—especially in urban neighborhoods desired by both millennials and baby boomers. Demand for these neighborhoods accelerates displacement of lower income residents.

Major Findings:

  • There are 3,600 fewer Black homeowners in Richmond today than in 2000. In Jackson Ward and Church Hill, the number of Black homeowners decreased by roughly 30%, while the number of White homeowners increased by more than 150%.
  • Without intervention, over 40% of all of our dedicated affordable rental homes will fall out of compliance (affordability) in the next 15 years.
Image

Goal 6: Expand Housing Choices for Moderate and Low Income Households.

The region’s housing stock is highly segregated by price and race. Few opportunities exist for lower income families to buy or rent in “communities of opportunity” where there is better access to jobs, transit and schools.

Major Findings:

  • Fewer than 1 in 10 of all dedicated affordable apartments are in high-opportunity school zones throughout the region, which prevents children from prospering academically.
  • Limited acceptance of housing choice vouchers by rental management companies keeps our region segregated by race and income.

*Priority Solutions

Criteria used for elevating certain solutions to priority status included:
  • Community input: How frequently did this strategy come up during the community engagement component of this project? Was it one voice or was there consensus?
  • Scope of need: To what extent will a strategy address a serious need (e.g., health or safety) with significant scale and reach?
  • Critical time frame: Does this strategy address a need where action is needed quickly, or the window for action will close (e.g., displacement pressure in rapidly changing neighborhoods)?
  • Regional applicability: Would the strategy have multi-jurisdictional or even regional potential, as opposed to a strategy that is only applicable in one locality?
  • Lower income impact: What is the impact this strategy will have on the lowest income households in the region? Often these individuals and families face the most serious and immediate challenges.
  • Racial equity: Will the effort significantly address racial disparity in housing opportunities? For example, to what extent might a strategy close the widening homeownership gap between white and black households?
  • Level of effort / Cost: Will the strategy be very difficult to accomplish or is it “lower hanging fruit”? Will the strategy require significant new funds or little to no new resources?
  • Legislative or regulatory change: Does the solution require a legislative or regulatory change?
Explore OUR Policy Agenda